From MFKP_wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Selection: with tag publication-errors [17 articles] 

 

Big names in statistics want to shake up much-maligned P value

  
Nature, Vol. 548, No. 7665. (26 July 2017), pp. 16-17, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22375

Abstract

One of scientists’ favourite statistics — the P value — should face tougher standards, say leading researchers. [Excerpt] Science is in the throes of a reproducibility crisis, and researchers, funders and publishers are increasingly worried that the scholarly literature is littered with unreliable results. Now, a group of 72 prominent researchers is targeting what they say is one cause of the problem: weak statistical standards of evidence for claiming new discoveries. [\n] In many disciplines the significance of findings is judged by ...

 

Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies

  
Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, Vol. 9, No. 3. (01 May 2014), pp. 278-292, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528520

Abstract

Recent events have led psychologists to acknowledge that the inherent uncertainty encapsulated in an inductive science is amplified by problematic research practices. In this article, we provide a practical introduction to recently developed statistical tools that can be used to deal with these uncertainties when performing and evaluating research. In Part 1, we discuss the importance of accurate and stable effect size estimates as well as how to design studies to reach a corridor of stability around effect size estimates. In ...

 

(INRMM-MiD internal record) List of keywords of the INRMM meta-information database - part 28

  
(February 2014)
Keywords: inrmm-list-of-tags   power-law   ppm   practice   pre-alpine   pre-print   precaution   precaution-principle   precipitation   precisely-wrong   precursor-research   predation   predator-satiation   predatory-publishers   prediction   prediction-bias   predictive-modelling   predictors   predisposition   premature-optimization   preparedness   preprints   prescribed-burn   presence-absence   presence-only   pressure-volume-curves   pressures   prestoea-montana   pretreatment   prey-predator   pricing   primary-productivity   principal-components-regression   prisoners-dilemma   pristiphora-abietina   probability-vs-possibility   problem-driven   processes   processing   production-rules   productivity   programming   progressive-learning   prolog   proportion   prosopis-alba   prosopis-glandulosa   prosopis-pallida   protected-areas   protected-species   protection   protective-forest   protocol-uncertainty   provenance   provisioning-services   pruning   prunus-avium   prunus-cerasifera   prunus-domestica   prunus-dulcis   prunus-fruticosa   prunus-ilicifolia   prunus-laurocerasus   prunus-mahaleb   prunus-malaheb   prunus-padus   prunus-salicina   prunus-serotina   prunus-spinosa   prunus-spp   prunus-tenella   pseudo-absences   pseudo-random   pseudoaraucaria-spp   pseudolarix-spp   pseudomonas-avellanae   pseudomonas-spp   pseudomonas-syringae   pseudotsuga   pseudotsuga-macrocarpa   pseudotsuga-menziesii   pseudotsuga-spp   psychology   pterocarpus-indicus   pterocarpus-officinalis   pterocarya-pterocarpa   public-domain   publication-bias   publication-delay   publication-errors   publish-or-perish   puccinia-coronata   pull-push-pest-control   pulp   punica-granatum   purdiaea-nutans   pyrenees-region   pyrolysis   pyrus-amygdaliformis   pyrus-browiczii  

Abstract

List of indexed keywords within the transdisciplinary set of domains which relate to the Integrated Natural Resources Modelling and Management (INRMM). In particular, the list of keywords maps the semantic tags in the INRMM Meta-information Database (INRMM-MiD). [\n] The INRMM-MiD records providing this list are accessible by the special tag: inrmm-list-of-tags ( http://mfkp.org/INRMM/tag/inrmm-list-of-tags ). ...

 

Reproducibility: a tragedy of errors

  
Nature, Vol. 530, No. 7588. (3 February 2016), pp. 27-29, https://doi.org/10.1038/530027a

Abstract

Mistakes in peer-reviewed papers are easy to find but hard to fix, report David B. Allison and colleagues. [Excerpt: Three common errors] As the influential twentieth-century statistician Ronald Fisher (pictured) said: “To consult the statistician after an experiment is finished is often merely to ask him to conduct a post mortem examination. He can perhaps say what the experiment died of.” [\n] [...] Frequent errors, once recognized, can be kept out of the literature with targeted education and policies. Three of the most common are ...

 

Read before you cite!

  
Complex Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3. (2003), pp. 269-274

Abstract

We report a method of estimating what percentage of people who cited a paper had actually read it. The method is based on a stochastic modeling of the citation process that explains empirical studies of misprint distributions in citations (which we show follows a Zipf law). Our estimate is only about 20% of citers read the original. ...

 

Verification of citations: fawlty towers of knowledge?

  
Interfaces, Vol. 38, No. 2. (April 2008), pp. 125-139, https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1070.0317

Abstract

The prevalence of faulty citations impedes the growth of scientific knowledge. Faulty citations include omissions of relevant papers, incorrect references, and quotation errors that misreport findings. We discuss key studies in these areas. We then examine citations to “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys,” one of the most frequently cited papers from the Journal of Marketing Research, to illustrate these issues. This paper is especially useful in testing for quotation errors because it provides specific operational recommendations on adjusting for nonresponse ...

 

Academic urban legends

  
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 44, No. 4. (1 August 2014), pp. 638-654, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714535679

Abstract

Many of the messages presented in respectable scientific publications are, in fact, based on various forms of rumors. Some of these rumors appear so frequently, and in such complex, colorful, and entertaining ways that we can think of them as academic urban legends. The explanation for this phenomenon is usually that authors have lazily, sloppily, or fraudulently employed sources, and peer reviewers and editors have not discovered these weaknesses in the manuscripts during evaluation. To illustrate this phenomenon, I draw upon ...

 

Research: All journals need to correct errors.

  
Nature, Vol. 504, No. 7478. (5 December 2013), pp. 33-33, https://doi.org/10.1038/504033d

Abstract

[Excerpt] Innocent errors are more commonplace than fraud in research papers, so they need to be identified and corrected promptly. We call for more journals to accept their responsibility to ensure that this happens. ...

 

What ranking journals has in common with astrology

  
Home About Login Register Search Current Archives Announcements Home > Vol 1, No 1 (2013) Roars Transactions, a Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, Vol. 1, No. 1. (2013), https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/3378

Abstract

[excerpt] Introduction. As scientists, we all send our best work to Science or Nature – or at least we dream of one day making a discovery we deem worthy of sending there. So obvious does this hierarchy in our journal landscape appear to our intuition, that when erroneous or fraudulent work is published in ‘high- ranking’ journals, we immediately wonder how this could have happened. Isn’t work published there the best there is? Vetted by professional editors before being sent out to the most critical ...

 

'Conferring authorship': Biobank stakeholders' experiences with publication credit in collaborative research

  
PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 9. (30 September 2013), pp. e76686-e76686, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076686

Abstract

Multi-collaborator research is increasingly becoming the norm in the field of biomedicine. With this trend comes the imperative to award recognition to all those who contribute to a study; however, there is a gap in the current âgold standardâ in authorship guidelines with regards to the efforts of those who provide high quality biosamples and data, yet do not play a role in the intellectual development of the final publication. We carried out interviews with 36 individuals working in, or with ...

 

Who's afraid of peer review?

  
Science (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 342, No. 6154. (04 October 2013), pp. 60-65, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60

Abstract

Dozens of open-access journals targeted in an elaborate Science sting accepted a spoof research article, raising questions about peer-review practices in much of the open-access world. ...

 

Commentary: Never trust your word processor

  
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 37, No. 6. (1 November 2009), pp. 377-377, https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20340

Abstract

In this article, the author talks about the auto correction mode of word processors that leads to a number of problems and describes an example in biochemistry exams that shows how word processors can lead to mistakes in databases and in papers. The author contends that, where this system is applied, spell checking should not be left to a word processor. ...

 

On the embedding phase of the Hopcroft and Tarjan planarity testing algorithm

  
In Algorithmica, Vol. 16, No. 2. (1996), pp. 233-242, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01940648

Abstract

We give a detailed description of the embedding phase of the Hopcroft and Tarjan planarity testing algorithm. The embedding phase runs in linear time. An implementation based on this paper can be found in [MMN]. ...

 

Erratum: A test of corrections for extraneous signals in gridded surface temperature data

  
Climate Research, Vol. 26 (2004), pp. 159-173

Abstract

There was a mistake in the command file used to compute the results in our paper (McKitrick & Michaels 2004). The formula for computing cosine of absolute latitude (COSABLAT) takes the angle in radians, but our data were entered in degrees. We have corrected this and produced new versions of the affected tables. Table 4 below, showing the central results of the paper, displays the original and corrected columns side-by-side for ease of comparison. Tables 5 to 8 are presented in corrected versions only. As is evident in Table 4, except ...

 

Corrigendum: Corrigendum to "A tailored solver for bifurcation analysis of ocean-climate models" [J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2007) 654-679]

  
J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 228, No. 13. (20 July 2009), pp. 4962-4964, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.04.002

Abstract

This corrigendum contains a correction to some of the results in the article ‘‘A tailored solver for bifurcation analysis of ocean-climate models” [2], in which it was demonstrated how the specific mathematical structure of the equations govern- ing oceanic flow can be exploited to build an efficient linear system solver for use in a continuation method. Compared to earlier work (e.g. [4]), an additional novelty was the implementation of the small slope approximation to Redi [3] isoneutral diffusion and Gent–McWilliams [1] ...

 

One in four citations in marine biology papers is inappropriate

  
Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 408 (03 June 2010), pp. 299-303, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08587

Abstract

Citing sources that do not support the assertion being made can misinform readers, perpetuate mistakes and deny credit to the researchers who should have been acknowledged. To quantify citation fidelity in marine biology, we retrieved 198 papers from 2 recent issues of 33 marine biology journals. From each paper we randomly selected 1 citation, recovered the source material, and evaluated its appropriateness. We discovered that the assertion was ‘clearly supported’ by the citation in only 75.8% of cases, the support was ...

 

Hidden dangers of a citation culture

  
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, Vol. 8 (03 June 2008), pp. 13-16, https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00091

Abstract

The influence of the journal impact factor and the effect of a ‘citation culture’ on science and scientists have been discussed extensively (Lawrence 2007; Curr Biol 17:R583–585). Neverthe- less, many still believe that the number of citations a paper receives provides some measure of its quality. This belief may be unfounded, however, as there are 2 substantial areas of error that can distort a citation count or any metric based on a citation count. One is the deliberate manipulation of the ...

This page of the database may be cited as:
Integrated Natural Resources Modelling and Management - Meta-information Database. http://mfkp.org/INRMM/tag/publication-errors

Publication metadata

Bibtex, RIS, RSS/XML feed, Json, Dublin Core

Meta-information Database (INRMM-MiD).
This database integrates a dedicated meta-information database in CiteULike (the CiteULike INRMM Group) with the meta-information available in Google Scholar, CrossRef and DataCite. The Altmetric database with Article-Level Metrics is also harvested. Part of the provided semantic content (machine-readable) is made even human-readable thanks to the DCMI Dublin Core viewer. Digital preservation of the meta-information indexed within the INRMM-MiD publication records is implemented thanks to the Internet Archive.
The library of INRMM related pubblications may be quickly accessed with the following links.
Search within the whole INRMM meta-information database:
Search only within the INRMM-MiD publication records:
Full-text and abstracts of the publications indexed by the INRMM meta-information database are copyrighted by the respective publishers/authors. They are subject to all applicable copyright protection. The conditions of use of each indexed publication is defined by its copyright owner. Please, be aware that the indexed meta-information entirely relies on voluntary work and constitutes a quite incomplete and not homogeneous work-in-progress.
INRMM-MiD was experimentally established by the Maieutike Research Initiative in 2008 and then improved with the help of several volunteers (with a major technical upgrade in 2011). This new integrated interface is operational since 2014.