From MFKP_wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Selection: Brembs:B [4 articles] 

Publications by author Brembs:B.

Redefine statistical significance

Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 2, No. 1. (1 September 2017), pp. 6-10,


We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance for claims of new discoveries from 0.05 to 0.005 ...


What ranking journals has in common with astrology

Home About Login Register Search Current Archives Announcements Home > Vol 1, No 1 (2013) Roars Transactions, a Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, Vol. 1, No. 1. (2013),


[excerpt] Introduction. As scientists, we all send our best work to Science or Nature – or at least we dream of one day making a discovery we deem worthy of sending there. So obvious does this hierarchy in our journal landscape appear to our intuition, that when erroneous or fraudulent work is published in ‘high- ranking’ journals, we immediately wonder how this could have happened. Isn’t work published there the best there is? Vetted by professional editors before being sent out to the most critical ...


Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 7 (2013),


Most researchers acknowledge an intrinsic hierarchy in the scholarly journals (“journal rank”) that they submit their work to, and adjust not only their submission but also their reading strategies accordingly. On the other hand, much has been written about the negative effects of institutionalizing journal rank as an impact measure. So far, contributions to the debate concerning the limitations of journal rank as a scientific impact assessment tool have either lacked data, or relied on only a few studies. In this ...


Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 7 (10 June 2013), 291,


Much has been said about the increasing bureaucracy in science, stifling innovation, hampering the creativity of researchers and incentivizing misconduct, even outright fraud. Many anecdotes have been recounted, observations described and conclusions drawn about the negative impact of impact assessment on scientists and science. However, few of these accounts have drawn their conclusions from data, and those that have typically relied on a few studies. In this review, we present the most recent and pertinent data on the consequences that our ...

This page of the database may be cited as:
Integrated Natural Resources Modelling and Management - Meta-information Database.

Publication metadata

Bibtex, RIS, RSS/XML feed, Json, Dublin Core

Meta-information Database (INRMM-MiD).
This database integrates a dedicated meta-information database in CiteULike (the CiteULike INRMM Group) with the meta-information available in Google Scholar, CrossRef and DataCite. The Altmetric database with Article-Level Metrics is also harvested. Part of the provided semantic content (machine-readable) is made even human-readable thanks to the DCMI Dublin Core viewer. Digital preservation of the meta-information indexed within the INRMM-MiD publication records is implemented thanks to the Internet Archive.
The library of INRMM related pubblications may be quickly accessed with the following links.
Search within the whole INRMM meta-information database:
Search only within the INRMM-MiD publication records:
Full-text and abstracts of the publications indexed by the INRMM meta-information database are copyrighted by the respective publishers/authors. They are subject to all applicable copyright protection. The conditions of use of each indexed publication is defined by its copyright owner. Please, be aware that the indexed meta-information entirely relies on voluntary work and constitutes a quite incomplete and not homogeneous work-in-progress.
INRMM-MiD was experimentally established by the Maieutike Research Initiative in 2008 and then improved with the help of several volunteers (with a major technical upgrade in 2011). This new integrated interface is operational since 2014.