From MFKP_wiki

Jump to: navigation, search


Pest categorisation of Ips cembrae

Michael Jeger, Claude Bragard, David Caffier, Thierry Candresse, Elisavet Chatzivassiliou, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Gianni Gilioli, Josep A. Jaques Miret, Alan MacLeod, Maria Navajas Navarro, Björn Niere, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Trond Rafoss, Vittorio Rossi, Gregor Urek, Ariena Van Bruggen, Wopke Van der Werf, Jonathan West, Stephan Winter, Virág Kertész, Mitesha Aukhojee, Jean‐Claude Grégoire

The Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the large larch bark beetle, Ips cembrae (Heer) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae), for the EU. I. cembrae is a well-defined and distinguishable species, native to Europe and recognised mainly as a pest of larch (Larix spp.) and occasionally of pine (Pinus spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.). It is distributed in 16 Member States of the EU and listed in Annex IIB of Council Directive 2000/29/EC. Protected zones are in place in Greece, Ireland and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland and Isle of Man). Wood, wood products, bark and wood packaging material are considered as pathways for this pest, which is also able to disperse by flight. The insects normally establish on fallen or weakened trees but, when their populations are high, can also mass-attack healthy trees. The males produce aggregation pheromones that attract conspecifics of both sexes. The insects also inoculate pathogenic fungi to their hosts. There are one to two generations per year. Before establishing their broods, the young adults need to proceed to maturation feeding either within the bark of the tree where they developed or in 2–18 years old twigs. I. cembrae has been expanding its geographical range in Europe during the second half of the 20th century. Sanitary thinning or clear felling is the major control methods. Quarantine measures are implemented to prevent entry in the protected zones. All criteria for consideration as potential protected zone quarantine pest are met. The criteria for considering I. cembrae as a potential regulated non-quarantine pest are not met since plants for planting are not viewed as a major pathway.

Excerpt (Disclaimer)

Disclaimer

The following text is a small excerpt from the original publication. Within the general INRMM-MiD goal of indexing useful meta-information on INRMM related publications, this excerpt is intended as a handy summary of some potentially interesting aspects of the publication. However, the excerpt is surely incomplete and some key aspects may be missing or their correct interpretation may require the full publication to be carefully read. Please, refer to the full publication for any detail.

OK


Conclusions. [...]
Identity of the pest ▹ The identity of the pest is established. It can be identified to the species level using conventional entomological keys and molecular methods. [...]
Absence/presence of the pest in the EU territory ▹ Ips cembrae is present and widely distributed in the EU, it has been reported from 16 MSs. It is a Protected Zone quarantine pest in Greece, Ireland and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland and Isle of Man) (Annex IIB). [...]
Regulatory status ▹ The pest is currently officially regulated by 2000/29/EC on plants of Abies, Larix, Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga over 3 m in height, other than fruit and seeds, wood of conifers (Coniferales) with bark, isolated bark of conifers.
I. cembrae is regulated as a quarantine pest in protected zones (Annex IIB): Greece, Ireland and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland and Isle of Man).
[...]
Although the pest is regulated on Abies and Pseudotsuga spp., there is no scientific evidence in the literature that Abies and Pseudotsuga spp. are hosts for I. cembrae. [...]
Pest potential for entry, establishment and spread in the EU territory ▹ Entry: the pest is already established in 16 MSs. Since entry by natural spread from EU areas where the pest is present is possible, only isolated areas (e.g. islands) can be long-term protected zones.
Establishment: the climate of the EU protected zones is similar to that of MSs where I. cembrae is established, and the pest's main host plants are present.
Spread: adults can disperse naturally. They can fly over tens of kilometers. The pest can also spread by human assistance, e.g. with the transportation of wood, wood chips, bark, wood packaging material, dunnage of conifers and possibly plants for planting. [...]
Plants for planting are not a major pathway. [...]
Uncertainty regarding the capacity of maturating adults to be transported in the shoots of young plants. [...]
Potential for consequences in the EU territory ▹ The pest usually attacks dead or dying trees, but is known to have killed thousands of healthy trees after triggering events such as storms or dry summers. [...]
Massive attacks on young forest trees, 8–12 years old, have been reported; maturation feeding occurs in young shoots. [...]
Available measures ▹ In isolated areas (e.g. islands) that cannot be reached by natural spread, measures can be put in place to prevent the introduction with wood, wood products, wood chips, bark and plants for planting. Debarking wood and heat treatment of wood, bark and chips and inspection of plants for planting are effective.
When such geographical barriers do not exist, there is no possibility to prevent the entry, establishment and spread of I. cembrae by natural dispersal. [...]
Although it is not common practice, plants for planting can be produced in pest-free places of production and can be sprayed with an insecticide prior to shipment. [...]
Conclusion on pest categorisation ▹ All criteria assessed by EFSA above for consideration as potential protected zone quarantine pest were met. [...]
The criteria for considering I. cembrae as a potential regulated non-quarantine pest are not met since plants for planting are not the main pathway. [...]
Aspects of assessment to focus on/scenarios to address in future if appropriate ▹ The pest is morphologically and biologically extremely close to Ips subelongatus, an Asian species still absent in Europe and which can introduce new pathogens. The capacity of maturating adults to be transported inconspicuously in the shoots of young plants is still unknown. [...]


EFSA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 11. (October 2017), e05039, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5039 
Key: INRMM:14472196

Keywords

                   


Article-Level Metrics (Altmetrics)
Digital Object Identifier


Available versions (may include free-access full text)

DOI, Pubget, PubMed (Search)

Further search for available versions

Search in ResearchGate (or try with a fuzzier search in ResearchGate)
Search in Mendeley (or try with a fuzzier search in Mendeley)

Publication metadata

Bibtex, RIS, RSS/XML feed, Json, Dublin Core
Metadata search: CrossRef DOI, DataCite DOI

Digital preservation of this INRMM-MiD record

Internet Archive

References

  1. Balachowsky, A., 1949. Faune de France. 50 Coleoptères Scolytides. Lechevalier, Paris. 320 pp.
  2. Balogun, R.A., 1970. The life-history and habits of the larch bark beetle, Ips cembrae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in the North-East of Scotland. The Canadian Entomologist 102, 226–239.
  3. Bossard, M., Feranec, J., Otahel, J., 2000. CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000. Technical Report 40, European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/032TFUPGVR ,   INRMM-MiD: 13106045 .
  4. Bright, D.E., Skidmore, R.E., 2002. A catalogue of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Supplement 2 (1995–1999). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada. 523 pp.
  5. Büttner, G., Kosztra, B., Maucha, G., Pataki, R., 2012. Implementation and achievements of CLC2006. Tech. rep., European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/GQ4JECM8TB ,   INRMM-MiD: 14284151 .
  6. Chararas, C., 1962. Etude biologique des scolytides des conifères. Encyclopédie Entomologique, Ser. A, Nr. 38, Paul Lechevalier, Paris.
  7. Chirici, G., Bertini, R., Travaglini, D., Puletti, N., Chiavetta, U., 2011a. The common NFI database. In: Chirici G, Winter S, McRoberts RE (eds). National Forest Inventories: Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Assessments. Springer, Berlin. pp. 99–119.
  8. Chirici, G., McRoberts, R.E., Winter, S., Barbati, A., Brändli U-B, Abegg, M., Beranova, J., Rondeux, J., Bertini, R., Alberdi Asensio, I., Condés, S., 2011b. Harmonization tests. In: Chirici G, Winter S, McRoberts RE (eds). National Forest Inventories: Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Assessments. Springer, Berlin. pp. 121–190.
  9. Crooke, M., Bevan, D., 1957. Note on the first British occurrence of Ips cembrae Heer (Col. Scolytidae). Forestry 30, 21–28.
  10. de Rigo, D., 2012. Semantic Array Programming for environmental modelling: application of the Mastrave library. In: Seppelt, R., Voinov, A.A., Lange, S., Bankamp, D., (eds.). International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Pathways and Visions under Uncertainty, Sixth Biennial Meeting. pp. 1167–1176.
  11. de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Busetto, L., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2014. Supporting EFSA assessment of the EU environmental suitability for exotic forestry pests: final report. EFSA Supporting Publications 11 (3), EN-434+. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.en-434 ,   INRMM-MiD: 13114000 .
  12. de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2016. The European Atlas of Forest Tree Species: modelling, data and information on forest tree species. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A., (eds.). European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp. e01aa69+. https://w3id.org/mtv/FISE-Comm/v01/e01aa69 .
  13. de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Barredo, J.I., 2017. Robust modelling of the impacts of climate change on the habitat suitability of forest tree species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 58 pp. ISBN:978-92-79-66704-6, https://doi.org/10.2760/296501 ,   INRMM-MiD: 14314400 .
  14. EFSA PLH Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Health), 2010. PLH Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 8(2), 1495+. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1495 .
  15. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2017. EPPO Global Database. https://gd.eppo.int .
  16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2004. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 21—Pest risk analysis of regulated non-quarantine pests. FAO, Rome, 30 pp. https://www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents//1323945746_ISPM_21_2004_En_2011-11-29_Refor.pdf .
  17. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2013. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 11—Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests. FAO, Rome, 36 pp. https://www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents/20140512/ispm_11_2013_en_2014-04-30_201405121523-494.65%20KB.pdf .
  18. Fettig, C.J., Hilszczanski, J., 2015. Management strategies for bark beetles in conifer forests. In: Vega, F.E., Hofstetter, R.W., (eds.). Bark Beetles. Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier, London. pp. 555–584.
  19. Francke, W., Vité, J.P., 1983. Oxygenated terpenes in pheromone systems of bark beetles. Journal of Applied Entomology 96, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1983.tb03655.x .
  20. Grégoire J-C and Evans, H.F., 2004. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms – an overview. In: Lieutier, F., Day, K.R., Battisti, A., Grégoire J-C and Evans, H.F., (eds.). Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. pp.19–37.
  21. Grégoire, J.C., Raffa, K.F., Lindgren, B.S., 2015. Economics and politics of bark beetles. In: Vega, F.E., Hofstetter, R.W., (eds.). Bark Beetles. Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier, London. Pp. 585–613.
  22. Grodzki, W., 2008. Ips cembrae Heer. (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in young larch stands - a new problem in Poland. Forstschutz Aktuell 44, 8–9.
  23. Grüne, S., 1979. Brief Illustrated Key to European Bark Beetles. M. & H Schaper, Hannover. 182 pp.
  24. Haack, R.A., 2001. Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at US ports of entry: 1985–2000. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 6, 253–282.
  25. Hiederer, R., Houston Durrant, T., Granke, O., Lambotte, M., Lorenz, M., Mignon, B., Mues, V., 2007. Forest focus monitoring database system - validation methodology. Vol. EUR 23020 EN of EUR – Scientific and Technical Research. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://doi.org/10.2788/51364 .
  26. Hiederer, R., Houston Durrant, T., Micheli, E., 2011. Evaluation of BioSoil demonstration project - Soil data analysis. Vol. 24729 of EUR - Scientific and Technical Research. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/56105 .
  27. Holuša, J., Kula, E., Wewiora, F., Karolina Lukašova, K., 2014. Flight activity, within the trap tree abundance and overwintering of the larch bark beetle (Ips cembrae) in Czech Republic. Šumarski List 138, 19–27.
  28. Houston Durrant, T., Hiederer, R., 2009. Applying quality assurance procedures to environmental monitoring data: a case study. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 11, 774–781.
  29. Houston Durrant, T., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Schulte, E., Suarez Meyer, A., 2011. Evaluation of BioSoil demonstration project: forest biodiversity - analysis of biodiversity module. Vol. 24777 of EUR – Scientific and Technical Research. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/84823 .
  30. Hulcr, J., Atkinson, T., Cognato, A.I., Jordal, B.H., McKenna, D.D., 2015. Morphology, taxonomy and phylogenetics of bark beetles. In: Vega, F.E., Hofstetter, R.W., (eds.). Bark Beetles. Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier, London. pp. 41–84.
  31. Jankowiak, R., Rossa, R., Mista, K., 2007. Survey of fungal species vectored by Ips cembrae to European larch trees in Raciborskie forests (Poland). Czech Mycology 59, 227–239.
  32. Jeger, M., Bragard, C., Caffier, D., Candresse, T., Chatzivassiliou, E., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Gilioli, G., Jaques Miret, J.A., MacLeod, A., Navajas Navarro, M., Niere, B., Parnell, S., Potting, R., Rafoss, T., Rossi, V., Urek, G., Van Bruggen, A., Van der Werf, W., West, J., Winter, S., Kertesz, V., Aukhojee, M., Grégoire, J.C., 2017. Pest categorisation of Ips typographus. EFSA Journal 15(7), 4881+. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4881 .
  33. Kirisits, T., 2004. Fungal associates of european bark beetles with special emphasis on the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: Lieutier, F., Day, K.R., Battisti, A., Grégoire, J.C., Evans, H.F., (eds.). Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Springer, Netherlands. pp. 181–236.
  34. Knížek, M., Beaver, R., 2004. Taxonomy and systematics of bark and ambrosia beetles. In: Lieutier, F., Day, K., Battisti, A., Grégoire, J.C., Evans, H., (eds.). Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2241-8_11 .
  35. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., Rubel, F., 2006. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrif 15, 259–263.
  36. Krehan, H., Cech, T.L., 2004. Larch damage in Upper Styria. An example of the complex effects of damage agents. Forstschutz Aktuell 32, 4–8.
  37. Lindelöw Ǻ, Isacsson, G., Ravn, H.P., Schroeder, M., 2015. Tetropium gabrieli and Ips cembrae (Coleoptera; Cerambycidae and Curculionidae) - invasion of two potential pest species on larch in Sweden. Entomologisk Tidskrift 136, 103–112.
  38. Luitjes, J., 1974. Ips cembrae, a new forest insect pest in the Netherlands. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 46, 244–246.
  39. Lundberg, S., 1988. Some interesting beetle finds in pine wood imported to Norrbotten Sweden. Entomologisk Tidskrift 109, 49–50.
  40. Moucheron, B., 2011. Presence of the large bark beetle Ips cembrae (Herr, 1836) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Lambillionea 111, 157–158.
  41. Redfern, D.B., Stoakley, J.T., Steele, H., Minter, D.W., 1987. Dieback and death of larch caused by Ceratocystis laricicola sp. nov. following attack by Ips cembrae. Plant Pathology 36, 467–480.
  42. Renwick, J.A.A., Dickens, J.C., 1979. Control of pheromone production in the bark beetle, Ips cembrae. Physiological Entomology 4, 377–381.
  43. San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2016. The European Union Forest Strategy and the Forest Information System for Europe. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A., (eds.). European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp. e012228+
  44. San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A., (eds.), 2016. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN: 978-92-79-36740-3, https://doi.org/10.2788/4251 , https://w3id.org/mtv/FISE-Comm/v01/ .
  45. Schedl, K.E., 1981. 91. Familie: Scolytidae (Borken- und Ambrosiakäfer). In: Freude, H., Harde, K.W., Lohse, G.A., (eds.). Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld. pp. 34–99.
  46. Scopus, 2017. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/home.uri .
  47. Stadelmann, G., Bugmann, H., Meier, F., Wermelinger, B., Bigler, C., 2013. Effects of salvage logging and sanitation felling on bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestations. Forest Ecology and Management 305, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.003 .
  48. Stauffer, C., 1997. A molecular method for differentiating sibling species within the genus Ips. In: Grégoire, J.C., Liebhold, A.M., Stephen, F.M., Day, K.R., Salom, S.M., (eds.). Integrating Cultural Tactics into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, 1–4 September. 1996. USDA, Forest Service General Technical Report NE-236, Vallombrosa, Italy. pp. 87–91.
  49. Stauffer, C., Kirisits, T., Nussbaumer, C., Pavlin, R., Wingfield, M.J., 2001. Phylogenetic relationships between the European and Asian eight spined larch bark beetle populations (Coleoptera, Scolyltidae) inferred from DNA sequences and fungal associates. European Journal of Entomology 98, 99–105.
  50. Voolma, K., Mandelshtam, M.J., Shcherbakov, A.N., Yakovlev, E.B., Õunap, H., Süda, I., Popovichev, B.G., Sharapa, T.V., Galasjeva, T.V., Khairetdinov, R.D., Lipatkin, V.A., Mozolevskaya, E.G., 2004. Distribution and spread of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) around the Gulf of Finland: a comparative study with notes on rare species of Estonia. Finland and North-Western Russia. Entomologica Fennica 15, 198–210.
  51. Wood, S.L., 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. 1359 pp.
  52. Zhang, Q.H., Birgersson, G., Schlyter, F., Chen-Guo, F., 2000. Pheromone components in the larch bark beetle, Ips cembrae, from China: quantitative variation among attack phases and individuals. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 841–858.
  53. Zhang, Q.H., Byers, J.A., Schlyter, F., 1992. Optimal attack density in the larch bark beetle, Ips cembrae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 672–678.




Meta-information Database (INRMM-MiD).
This database integrates a dedicated meta-information database in CiteULike (the CiteULike INRMM Group) with the meta-information available in Google Scholar, CrossRef and DataCite. The Altmetric database with Article-Level Metrics is also harvested. Part of the provided semantic content (machine-readable) is made even human-readable thanks to the DCMI Dublin Core viewer. Digital preservation of the meta-information indexed within the INRMM-MiD publication records is implemented thanks to the Internet Archive.
The library of INRMM related pubblications may be quickly accessed with the following links.
Search within the whole INRMM meta-information database:
Search only within the INRMM-MiD publication records:
Full-text and abstracts of the publications indexed by the INRMM meta-information database are copyrighted by the respective publishers/authors. They are subject to all applicable copyright protection. The conditions of use of each indexed publication is defined by its copyright owner. Please, be aware that the indexed meta-information entirely relies on voluntary work and constitutes a quite incomplete and not homogeneous work-in-progress.
INRMM-MiD was experimentally established by the Maieutike Research Initiative in 2008 and then improved with the help of several volunteers (with a major technical upgrade in 2011). This new integrated interface is operational since 2014.