From MFKP_wiki

Jump to: navigation, search


The most recent view of vulnerability

Stefan Schneiderbauer, Elisa Calliari, Unni Eidsvig, Michael Hagenlocher

edited by: Karmen Poljanšek, Montserrat Marín Ferrer, Tom De Groeve, Ian Clark



Excerpt (Disclaimer)

Disclaimer

The following text is a small excerpt from the original publication. Within the general INRMM-MiD goal of indexing useful meta-information on INRMM related publications, this excerpt is intended as a handy summary of some potentially interesting aspects of the publication. However, the excerpt is surely incomplete and some key aspects may be missing or their correct interpretation may require the full publication to be carefully read. Please, refer to the full publication for any detail.

OK


Conclusions and key messages. Over the past decades, vulnerability research has made considerable progress in understanding some of the root causes and dynamic pressures that influence the progression of vulnerability and raised awareness that disasters are not natural but predominantly a product of social, economic and political conditions (Wisner et al., 2004).
Vulnerability assessments are a response to the call for evidence by decision- makers for use in pre-disaster risk assessment, prevention and reduction, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate preparedness and effective disaster response strategies by providing information on people, communities or regions at risk.
The following steps are proposed to further improve vulnerability research and related applications with the final aim to inform policymakers to most appropriately:
co-produce knowledge in a transdisciplinary environment;
evaluate and present inherent uncertainties;
integrate intangible but crucial factors into quantitative assessments;
develop and apply methods that allow for considering cascading and multirisks;
combine vulnerability scenarios with (climate-) hazard scenarios when assessing future risks;
empower communities to better understand and reduce their vulnerability in order to make them more resilient to identified hazards;
design and facilitate multilevel and cross-sectoral feedback loops between public, practitioners and policymaking bodies (local, regional, national and European) and other stakeholders;
standardise vulnerability assessment approaches in order to allow for more comparison (in space and time);
work on improved evidence within vulnerability assessment — this requires continuous effort to improve loss and damage data.
Partnership ▹ The comprehensive analysis and assessment of vulnerability requires an interdisciplinary approach involving both natural and social sciences. In addition, in order to foster sustainable and efficient vulnerability reduction strategies and measures, an approach to produce knowledge co-productively is desirable. This calls for a partnership with affected communities, practitioners and decision-makers. A stronger link and enhanced interaction with other relevant communities is desirable, namely climate change adaptation, natural resource management, public health, spatial planning and development.
Knowledge ▹ The determination of risk often remains hazard centred and hazard specific and does not consider vulnerability appropriately. Vulnerability assessment has tended to be mostly quantitative in nature. Cultural aspects as well as formal (procedures, laws and regulations) and tacit informal (values, norms and traditions) institutions play a fundamental role as both enabling or limiting factors of resilience and have not gained sufficient attention. A challenge is the need to consider local data and information in order to account for small-scale specificities of vulnerability. Present databases on damage and loss caused by natural hazards should be standardised and extended to support evidence building in vulnerability assessment. Existing barriers in the co-production, exchange and use of knowledge have to be understood and minimised.
Innovation ▹ In recent years, improved approaches to assess vulnerability by statistical analyses or indices have been established. Fostering the integration of Earth observation data and technology to detect changes would improve the possibility to represent some of the dynamic aspects of vulnerability. Further improvement requires enhanced event and damage databases and more sophisticated methods for potential future vulnerability pathways and their integration into risk scenarios. The challenge to integrate qualitative information, which often contains crucial facts, needs to be addressed. Observation data and technology to detect changes would improve the possibility to represent some of the dynamic aspects of vulnerability. Further improvements require enhanced event and damage databases and more sophisticated methods for potential future vulnerability pathways and their integration into risk scenarios. The challenge to integrate qualitative information, which often contains crucial facts, need to be addressed.
[...]


In Science for disaster risk management 2017: knowing better and losing less, Vol. 28034 (2017), pp. 70-84 
Key: INRMM:14445234

Keywords

                     



Available versions (may include free-access full text)

http://drmkc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/portals/0/K…

Further search for available versions

Search in ResearchGate (or try with a fuzzier search in ResearchGate)
Search in Mendeley (or try with a fuzzier search in Mendeley)

Publication metadata

Bibtex, RIS, RSS/XML feed, Json, Dublin Core

Digital preservation of this INRMM-MiD record

Internet Archive

References

  1. Alexander, D., Magni, M., 2013. Mortality in the L'Aquila ( Central Italy ) Earthquake of 6 April 2009. PLOS Current Disasters, (April 2009).
  2. Alexander, D., 2010. The L'Aquila Earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian Government Policy on Disaster Response. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2(4), 325–342.
  3. Alexander, D., 2013. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13 (11), 2707–2716.
  4. BEH, UNU-EHS, 2016. WorldRiskReport 2016. Berlin and Bonn: Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft and United Nations University – EHS.
  5. Birkmann, J., Cardona, O.D., Carreno, M.L., Barbat, A.H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., M.Keiler, Alexander, D., Zeil, P., T., W., 2013. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses : the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards, 67, 193–211.
  6. Birkmann, J., Kienberger, S., Alexander, D., 2014. Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards : a European perspective. San Diego and Waltham, USA: Elsevier Inc.
  7. Brooks, N., 2003. Vulnerability, risk and adaptation : a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 38 .
  8. Buth, M., Kahlenborn, W., Savelsberg, J., Becker, N., Bubeck, P., Kabisch, S., Kind, C., Tempel, A., Tucci, F., Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., Lindner, C., Lückenkötter, J., Schonlau, M., Schmitt, H., Hurth, F., Othmer, F., Augustin, R., Becker, D., Abel, M., Bornemann, T., Steiner, H., Zebisch, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kofler, C., 2015. Germany's vulnerability to climate change. Summary. Dessau-Roßla.
  9. Cardona, O.D., Aalst, M.K. van, Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R.S., Schipper, E.L.F., Sinh, B.T., 2012. Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: C. B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley, (Eds.) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 65–108.
  10. Carreño, M.L., Barbat, A.H., Cardona, O.D., Marulanda, M.C., 2014. Holistic evaluation of seismic risk in Barcelona. In: Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. 21–52.
  11. Carreño, M.-L., Cardona, O.D., Barbat, A.H., 2007. Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach. Natural Hazards, 40(1), 137–172.
  12. CI:GRASP, n.d. The Climate Impacts: Global and Regional Adaptation Support Platform. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/cigrasp-2/index.html .
  13. Ciscar, J.-C., Feyen, L., Soria, A., Lavalle, C., Raes, F., Perry, M., Nemry, F., Demirel, H., Rozsai, M., Dosio, A., Donatelli, M., Srivastava, A. K., Fumagalli, D., Niemeyer, S., Shrestha, S., Ciaian, P., Himics, M., Van Doorslaer, B., Barrios, S., Ibáñez, N., Forzieri, G., Rojas, R., Bianchi, A., Dowling, P., Camia, A., Libertà, G., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Barredo, J. I., Paci, D., Pycroft, J., Saveyn, B., Van Regemorter, D., Revesz, T., Vandyck, T., Vrontisi, Z., Baranzelli, C., Vandecasteele, I., Batista e Silva, F., Ibarreta, D., 2014. Climate impacts in Europe - The JRC PESETA II project. Vol. 26586 of EUR - Scientific and Technical Research. Publications Office of the European Union, 155 pp. https://doi.org/10.2791/7409 .
  14. Climate-ADAPT, n.d. European climate adaptation platform. http://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu .
  15. Cutter, S., Emrich, C.T., Mitchell, J.T., Boruff, B.J., Gall, M., Schmidtlein, M.C., Burton, G.C., 2006. The Long Road Home: Race, Class, and Recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment, 48(2), 8–20.
  16. Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L., 2003. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
  17. Cutter, S.L., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Altan, O., Baker, D.N., Briceño, S., Gupta, H., Holloway, A., Johnston, D., McBean, G.A., Ogawa, Y., Paton, D., Porio, E., Silbereisen, R.K., Takeuchi, K., Valsecchi, G.B., Vogel, C., Wu, G., 2015. Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature, (55), 277–279.
  18. De Groeve, T., Poljansek, K., Vernaccini, L., 2015. Index for Risk Management - INFORM. Concept and Methodology. EUR 26528EN, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  19. Dilley, M., Chen, R.S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A.L., Arnold, M., Agwe, J., Buys, P., Kjekstad, O., Lyon, B., Gregory, Y., 2005. Natural Disaster Hotspots A Global Risk. Disaster Risk Management Series. Washington DC, USA.
  20. EC, 2013. EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. Economist Intelligence Unit, 2009. Managing supply-chain risk for reward. London. New York, Hong Kong.
  21. EEA, 2012. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe: An indicator-based report. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
  22. EEA, 2017. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe: An indicator-based report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  23. ESPON, 2011. ESPON CLIMATE-Climate Change and Territorial Effects on Regions and Local Economies. Luxembourg.
  24. Fekete, A., 2009. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9 (2), 393–403.
  25. Fernandez, P., Mourato, S., Moreira, M., 2016. Social vulnerability assessment of flood risk using GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis. A case study of Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7 (4), 1367–1389.
  26. Fritzsche, K., Schneiderbauer, S., Bubeck, P., Kienberger, S., Buth, M., Zebisch, M., Kahlenborn, W., 2014. The Vulnerability Sourcebook: Concept and guidelines for standardised vulnerability assessments. Bonn and Eschborn.
  27. Garschagen, M., 2014. Risky Change? Vulnerability and adaptation between climate change and transformation dynamics in Can Tho City, Vietnam. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  28. Greiving, S., Zebisch, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Fleischhauer, M., Lindner, C., Lückenkötter, J., Buth, M., Kahlenborn, W., Schauser, I., 2015. A consensus based vulnerability assessment to climate change in Germany. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 7(3), 306–326.
  29. Hagenlocher, M., Delmelle, E., Casas, I., Kienberger, S., 2013. Assessing socioeconomic vulnerability to dengue fever in Cali, Colombia: statistical vs expert-based modeling. International Journal of Health Geographics, 12- 36.
  30. Hazus, n.d. Hazus: FEMA's Methodology for Estimating Potential Losses from Disasters. https://www.fema.gov/hazus .
  31. Hinkel, J., 2011. ‘Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity': Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 198–208. INFORM subnational models, n.d. INFORM Subnational risk index. http://www.inform-index.org/Subnational .
  32. INFORM, n.d. Index For Risk Management. http://www.inform-index.org/ .
  33. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.
  34. IPCC, 2012a. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
  35. IPCC, 2012b. Summary for policymakers - Special report on managing the risk of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (SREX). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  36. IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.
  37. Jansson, N.A.U., 2004. Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management app roach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34, 434–456.
  38. Johnson, C.W., 2007. Analysing the Causes of the Italian and Swiss Blackout, 28th September 2003. In: Tony Cant, ed. 12th Australian Conference on Safety Critical Systems and Software Conference. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
  39. Kelman, I., Gaillard, J.C., Lewis, J., Mercer, J., 2016. Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 129–143.
  40. Kienberger, S., Contreras, D., Zeil, P., 2014. Spatial and Holisitc Assessment of Social, Economic, and Environmental Vulnerability to Floods – Lessons from the Salzach River Basin, Austria. In: J. Birkmann, S. Kienberger, and D. E. Alexander, eds. Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: A European Perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 53–73.
  41. Kropp, J. p., Block, A., Reusswig, F., Zickfeld, K., Schellnhuber, H.J., 2006. Semiquantitative Assessment of Regional Climate Vulnerability: The North-Rhine Westphalia Study. Climatic Change, 76 (3-4), 265–290.
  42. Mc Michael, A.J., 2013. Globalization, Climate Change, and Human Health. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1335–1343.
  43. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A., 2010. Assessment of economic flood damage. Natural Hazards And Earth System Sciences, 10(8), 1697–1724.
  44. Met Office and WFP, 2014. Climate impacts on food security and nutrition. A review of existing knowledge. Rome, Italy.
  45. Meyer, V., Becker, N., Markantonis, V., Schwarze, R., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Bouwer, L.M., Bubeck, P., Ciavola, P., Genovese, E., Green, C., Hallegatte, S., Kreibich, H., Lequeux, Q., Logar, I., Papyrakis, E., Pfurtscheller, C., Poussin, J., Przylusky, V., Thieken, A.H., Viavattene, C., 2013. Review article : Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps, 13, 1351–1373.
  46. Meyer, W., 2011. Measurement: Indicators – Scales – Indices – Interpretations. In: R. Stockmann, ed. A Practitioner Handbook on Evaluation. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 189–219.
  47. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.
  48. ND-GAIN , n.d. Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN). http://index.gain.org .
  49. Oppenheimer, M., Campos, M., R.Warren, Birkmann, J., Luber, G., O'Neill, B., Takahashi, K., 2014. Emergent Risks and Key Vulnerabilities. In: C. B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White, eds. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA,: Cambridge University Press, 1039–1099.
  50. PBL, 2012. Effect of climate changes on waterborne disease in The Netherlands. The Hague.
  51. Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C., Mouton, F., 2009. Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9 (4), 1149–1159.
  52. Pescaroli, G., Alexander, D., 2016. Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 175–192.
  53. Prutsch, A., Torsten Grothmann, Sabine McCallum, Inke Schauser, and Rob Swart, 2014. Climate change adaptation manual : lessons learned from European and other industrialised countries. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
  54. Robine, J.-M., Cheung, S.L.K., Le Roy, S., Van Oyen, H., Griffiths, C., Michel, J.-P., Herrmann, F.R., 2008. Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. Comptes rendus biologies, 331 (2), 171–8.
  55. Schneiderbauer, S., Ehrlich, D., 2006. Social Levels and Hazard (in)-Dependence. In: J. Birkmann, ed. Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press, 78–102.
  56. Schneiderbauer, S., Zebisch, M., Kass, S., Pedoth, L., 2013. Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change in mountain environments. In: J. Birkmann, ed. Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press, 349 – 380.
  57. Tas, M., Tas, N., Durak, S., Atanur, G., 2013. Flood disaster vulnerability in informal settlements in Bursa, Turkey. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 443–463.
  58. Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P.A., Mccarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J.X., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A., 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079.
  59. UK, 2016. UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017. Synthesis Report. London, UK.
  60. UNDRO, 1984. Disaster Prevention and Mitigation: a Compendium of Current Knowledge. Volume 11. Geneva: United Nations, Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator.
  61. UNISDR, 2015a. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. http://www.wcdrr.org/uploads/Sendai_Framework_for_Disaster_Risk_Reduction_2015-2030.pdf .
  62. UNISDR Terminology, 2017.https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology .
  63. UNISDR, 2015b. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction.
  64. Wannewitz, S., Hagenlocher, M., Garschagen, M., 2016. Development and validation of a sub-national multi-hazard risk index for the Philippines. GI_Forum – Journal for Geographic Information Science, 1, 133-140.
  65. Welle, T., Birkmann, J., 2015. The World Risk Index – An Approach to Assess Risk and Vulnerability on a Global Scale. Journal of Extreme Events, 02 (01), 1550003.
  66. Welle, T., Depietri, Y., Angignard, M., Birkmann, J., Renaud, F., Greiving, S., 2014. Vulnerability Assessment to Heat Waves, Floods, and Earthquakes Using the MOVE Framework: Test Case Cologne, Germany. In: J. Birkmann, S. Kienberger, and D. E. Alexander, eds. Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: A European Perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 91–124.
  67. Wisner, B., 2016. Vulnerability as Concept , Model , Metric , and Tool. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford University Press, 1–58.
  68. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., 2004. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
  69. Yusuf, A.A., Francisco, H., 2009. Climate Change Vulnerability Mapping for Southeast Asia. Singapore.


Meta-information Database (INRMM-MiD).
This database integrates a dedicated meta-information database in CiteULike (the CiteULike INRMM Group) with the meta-information available in Google Scholar, CrossRef and DataCite. The Altmetric database with Article-Level Metrics is also harvested. Part of the provided semantic content (machine-readable) is made even human-readable thanks to the DCMI Dublin Core viewer. Digital preservation of the meta-information indexed within the INRMM-MiD publication records is implemented thanks to the Internet Archive.
The library of INRMM related pubblications may be quickly accessed with the following links.
Search within the whole INRMM meta-information database:
Search only within the INRMM-MiD publication records:
Full-text and abstracts of the publications indexed by the INRMM meta-information database are copyrighted by the respective publishers/authors. They are subject to all applicable copyright protection. The conditions of use of each indexed publication is defined by its copyright owner. Please, be aware that the indexed meta-information entirely relies on voluntary work and constitutes a quite incomplete and not homogeneous work-in-progress.
INRMM-MiD was experimentally established by the Maieutike Research Initiative in 2008 and then improved with the help of several volunteers (with a major technical upgrade in 2011). This new integrated interface is operational since 2014.